raeschae: (Text - Shut Up)
[personal profile] raeschae
So I'm looking around at headlines and whatnot - trying to make myself more knowledgeable about the world around me - when I run into this:

NY Judge: 4-Year-Old Can Be Sued for Bike Accident



(Oct. 29) -- A little girl who allegedly drove her bicycle into an elderly woman when she was 4 can be sued for negligence, a New York judge has ruled.

Juliet Breitman was 4 years old in April 2009 when she allegedly raced her bicycle -- still fitted with training wheels -- into 87-year-old Claire Menagh in Manhattan. The woman suffered a hip fracture that required surgery; she died a few weeks later, according to The New York Times.

Courts have ruled that children under the age of 4 cannot be held legally liable. But Justice Paul Wooten of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan said that Juliet can be sued because she was almost 5 years old at the time of the incident in question.

A lawyer for Juliet and her mother, Dana Breitman, had argued that taking such legal action against a pre-kindergartner at play was illogical. "Juliet was not engaged in an adult activity; she was riding her bicycle with her training wheels under the supervision of her mother," attorney James Tyrie wrote in court papers, according to The Wall Street Journal.

But Wooten said supervision didn't excuse the behavior. "A parent's presence alone does not give a reasonable child carte blanche to engage in risky behavior such as running across a street," he wrote.

Wooten also said Breitman was old enough at the time of the alleged accident to know that hitting an elderly woman was wrong. He said there were no "mitigating factors apparent in the record that would indicate that another child of similar age and capacity under the circumstances could not have reasonably appreciated the danger of riding a bicycle into an elderly woman."

Tyrie and Breitman did not immediately return calls for comment this morning.



Seriously, just...am I missing something? Can someone please point out the logic that I'm not seeing? I DON'T GET IT!!!

Date: 2010-10-29 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Well, technically, her parents would have to pay. They're not going to assume to get anything from a child. Still. Sheesh.

Date: 2010-10-29 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imaginethehappy.livejournal.com
well, yes. I'm just sayin.

although, I can just imagine a five year old in a court room, in a booster seat so she could see over the table... traumatized for life from riding a bike EVER again...

*goes back to hiding under the couch*

Date: 2010-10-29 10:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I know I'm not supposed to laugh but I'm just imagining a kid who cries every time she walks into the garage and sees her little pink bike with the handle bar streamers and the Barbie basket.

Date: 2010-10-29 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
It is. Now I'm pouting.

Date: 2010-10-29 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imaginethehappy.livejournal.com
AWE no pouting :( *snuggles*

Date: 2010-10-29 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I'm all for snuggles!

Profile

raeschae: (Default)
raeschae

January 2013

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 04:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios