raeschae: (Default)
[personal profile] raeschae
So yesterday, [livejournal.com profile] vamphile posted a poll about what she should write next. This morning, while working on a Creative Control time stamp, I realized that I have three WIPs that I could possibly turn into new stories, but I don't know which way I want to go, or even if I should try. So I'm totally ripping off Vamp's idea and leaving it up to y'all.

Where do I go? What do I do? Prod me. Guide me. Prompt me. HELP ME!



[Poll #1532684]

Date: 2010-03-02 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
Clearly, I want more Creative Control (don't we all?), but I voted for hooker!fic (because I want to see Jensen with ZERO GAME. Oh, bb.) and not-quite-phone sex!fic (because, apparently, I like the idea of them not having phone sex? Brain? IDEK.)

Also: I'm not sure I ever put that many parentheses and other punctuation marks in one single sentence. Do I get a cookie?

ETA: I also wonder why a hooker would pose as a college student. I really do. I mean, is hookerdom (sic!) like working for the FBI? Do they go undercover a lot?
Edited Date: 2010-03-02 04:18 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-02 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
There's a cookie with your name on it, to be fed to you by one JTP. Or JRA. The preference is yours really - you've earned it for using everything Schoolhouse Rock had to teach us about grammar in one sentence. Impressive!

Date: 2010-03-02 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
Thank you! I strive to impress.

Re: cookie-feeding preferences: Tha'ts awfully kind of you, ma'am. And nice touch with the initals; I generally try to keep things on a first-name basis, myself. Full names, which imply fully-realized personalities, only get in the way of objectification.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Obviously, the most important thing is that nothing so silly as a name get in the way of our objectification. I was going to go with "Mr." but that felt awfully formal. Also, full names take longer to spell and I'm lazy.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
I was going to go with "Mr." but that felt awfully formal.

It does feel awfully formal. Especially once you read (and wrote) about them together and with no clothes on.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I think, in the CC time stamp I'm working on now, I'm going to have Jared ask Jensen to call him Mr. Padalecki. And to only speak in complete sentences while they're together and with no clothes on. That sounds like them . . . *hm*.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
This thread continues to be full of intriguing things.

I like complete sentences when they're together and with no clothes on. I wish I could say that about the complete sentences in the paper I need to write.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I feel I may have gotten somewhat sidetracked. And I blame you for it completely.

What're you writin' about? (How's that for grammar to dazzle and impress?)

Date: 2010-03-02 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
How come the buck always stops right here with me?

I am so thoroughly dazzled and impressed by your grammar; I can't even elaborate on the Shakespeare paper I'm trying to avoid work on.

Date: 2010-03-02 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Ah. Good ole' Bill Shakespeare. I used to love him.
Edited Date: 2010-03-02 05:10 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-02 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
I still do, I have to say - I've seen more productions than might strictly be healthy - but this paper makes me want to tear my hair out a little.

But hey, other people are busy fighting the apocalpyse, right?

I love your icon, btw.

Date: 2010-03-02 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Thanks! It serves me well on so many occasions.

I used to think he was over-rated, but classic is classic for a reason, kids.

Think your prof would be okay with you just handing something in that says, "I would have written this paper, but I decided to fight the apocalypse instead?" I'd give you mad points for that. (Which could be the reason I'm not a professor of anything.)

Date: 2010-03-02 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
I was the exact same way - and there are still plays and scenes that don't work for me - but over time, I came to really appreciate his work.

Much Ado has some of the finest and wittiest banter written to this date, and if you don't think Richard III is one of the snarkiest, most ruthless and badass characters ever, you're probably dead inside a little. (Accidentally, there are great movie adaptations for both: the Emma Thompson/Kenneth Brannagh and Ian McKellen one, respectively.)

Think your prof would be okay with you just handing something in that says, "I would have written this paper, but I decided to fight the apocalypse instead?" I'd give you mad points for that.

- Worth a try, right? Or I could give him some gay porn I wrote and hope for a heart attack. Too bad I actually like him.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 05:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 07:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 07:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 07:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 07:29 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-03-02 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Maybe it's a sting operation. Maybe he's in the witness protection program. You don't know. The possibilities are endless. (This is my attempt at stealthy.)

Date: 2010-03-02 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangeallure.livejournal.com
Oh wow, the witness protection program can give you a new identity as a hooker? That is so awesome.

Where's the next crime for me to witness? I'd just love for a government offical to teach me in the ways of the street ...

Seriously, though: your attempt is working. I am intrigued.

Date: 2010-03-02 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Oh, well much like in fic, when the government makes you a hooker, it goes something like this:

"We found a small, out-of-the-way town for you to hide in, and an identity for you to assume. You'll be a hooker, but don't worry - your only tricks will be incredibly good-looking and only want you to do what you're comfortable doing. Also, they'll always make sure that you get off, too, before they ask you kindly to leave. If you meet one you're particularly fond of and find yourself falling in love with, the bad men will stop trying to find you and kill you and everyone will live happily ever after. . . Yes, I'm completely serious. . . You are welcome."

Date: 2010-03-02 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com
That would work a lot easier with the phone sex story...


Jensen Ackles lost his boyfriend to the witness protection program. He leads a lonely, secluded life until one night, he decides to call the phone sex line... and recognizes the operator's voice. Dunnn Dunnnn. Will glass fiber cable stand in the way of their happiness, or will it be the heartstrings reconnecting their eternal love. Will Jensen lose the number? Will the call get disconnected? Wait and find out, March 17 on the Hallmark channel.

Date: 2010-03-02 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Well, hell. Why don't I just write that one, then, and forget about all this other bull shit?

Date: 2010-03-02 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com
Nono, write the other one... the other one.
(And then that one as a parody. :p It'll be like Top Gun followed by Hot Shots. A combo you can't say no to!)

The sequel can be where Jared loses hope to ever hear Jensen's voice again (because he did lose the phone number) and becomes a hooker for the government. Kind of like Alias meets Nikita, only more gay and with less spying. Same amount of ridiculous wigs, though.

Ah, I should stop. I need to go back to writing... riiight. (I can fit that audiobook charity thing into a fic, actually, but it went past 18k words and I've lost interest. If I ever dig it out again and finish it, you'll get a mention in the disclaimer for being encouraging. Maybe in a couple years time, someone will pop onto storyfinders, asking 'I rembr this Story where Janson and Jured rad audiobuks 4 Charity.' - and then I'll know I made it. :D)


I really like the witness protection high class hooker premise, though. >_> Seriously! Imagine: Hollywood Hooker. He Hooks Hotties with Protection for Protection.

Date: 2010-03-02 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I'm not entirely certain, but I think it's possible that I now want to marry you. Where do I even start.

Kind of like Alias meets Nikita, only more gay and with less spying. Same amount of ridiculous wigs, though.

Now I want to write that fic most of all! Brilliant.

And I'll take the credit, AND post the storyfinders request, because that's maybe the funniest thing I've seen all day. I love when people are looking for my stuff there - once, I was reading the request and I got all the way through it before I realized they were looking for my fic. The human brain is an interesting thing that recalls the most obscure details sometimes.

Date: 2010-03-02 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com
♥!

I mostly get embarrassed by the storyfinders comm of Supernatural, because they only look for my blindfold fics. (And the things I wrote there shall never get out. But possibly be continued in the next round. XD *shameface*) I had two last week and then debated with myself if I should be so corny and reply. I did, but quietly and anonymously and feeling horrible for commenting. (I don't know why! It's just weird to link to my own story. :/) Talk about obscure details. One of the requesters could only remember the title of the series and I gave my series the most disgusting, unimaginative title ever. Arrgh. It all comes back to haunt you, I tell you. *g*

I love storyfinders, though. Some people ask for the weirdest things. (And secretly I repost the weirdest requests to my LJ to amuse my flist. :p But don't tell anyone.)

Date: 2010-03-02 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
Your secret is safe with me.

And wait - you're posting stuff at the kink meme? Now I'm gonna be all curious! You have to tell me which ones - send me an e-mail or a private message! Come on - you know you want to!

Date: 2010-03-02 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com
I do have a list somewhere... I'll send you a copy via PM. Your icon makes me do it.

Date: 2010-03-02 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
\0/

(I have a whole folder of BDSM-themed icons, but there's only so much space on my pic list.)

Date: 2010-03-02 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com
That icon is pure awesome! Realism ftw. :D

(Also, I think that list is only the first round of blindfold? I should compile a big list some time. A secret big list. I've got them all in my delicious. Locked. Tagged "wheresmyfic" just in case I need to find them again. *g*)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 06:53 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iniq.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-03-02 07:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

Profile

raeschae: (Default)
raeschae

January 2013

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 07:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios