raeschae: (Text - Shut Up)
[personal profile] raeschae
So I'm looking around at headlines and whatnot - trying to make myself more knowledgeable about the world around me - when I run into this:

NY Judge: 4-Year-Old Can Be Sued for Bike Accident



(Oct. 29) -- A little girl who allegedly drove her bicycle into an elderly woman when she was 4 can be sued for negligence, a New York judge has ruled.

Juliet Breitman was 4 years old in April 2009 when she allegedly raced her bicycle -- still fitted with training wheels -- into 87-year-old Claire Menagh in Manhattan. The woman suffered a hip fracture that required surgery; she died a few weeks later, according to The New York Times.

Courts have ruled that children under the age of 4 cannot be held legally liable. But Justice Paul Wooten of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan said that Juliet can be sued because she was almost 5 years old at the time of the incident in question.

A lawyer for Juliet and her mother, Dana Breitman, had argued that taking such legal action against a pre-kindergartner at play was illogical. "Juliet was not engaged in an adult activity; she was riding her bicycle with her training wheels under the supervision of her mother," attorney James Tyrie wrote in court papers, according to The Wall Street Journal.

But Wooten said supervision didn't excuse the behavior. "A parent's presence alone does not give a reasonable child carte blanche to engage in risky behavior such as running across a street," he wrote.

Wooten also said Breitman was old enough at the time of the alleged accident to know that hitting an elderly woman was wrong. He said there were no "mitigating factors apparent in the record that would indicate that another child of similar age and capacity under the circumstances could not have reasonably appreciated the danger of riding a bicycle into an elderly woman."

Tyrie and Breitman did not immediately return calls for comment this morning.



Seriously, just...am I missing something? Can someone please point out the logic that I'm not seeing? I DON'T GET IT!!!

Date: 2010-10-29 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jesseofthenorth.livejournal.com
You know what makes me sad about this whole thing? That old woman died and I'm pretty sure that the girl Juliet knows it. Cuz hello big fucking court room drama. Do you think she blames herself? Fuck I hope not. Seriously who's idea was it to sue this little kid ? Couldn't they just file it under "Shit Happens" were it belongs? They had to try and destroy a fur year olds life. Shame on the court and that judge.

Date: 2010-10-29 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raeschae.livejournal.com
I really hope that maybe her parents are trying to shield her from as much of this as they possibly can. I don't know - it just all seems so damn ridiculous to me.

Date: 2010-10-29 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jesseofthenorth.livejournal.com
It is completely ridiculous !I'm sure they are trying to shield her from it but this cluster-fuck made it into the New York Times the chances of this kid not knowing some of it are damned low.
This shit leaves me a bit breathless it's so ... insane! Like, reallY? WTF ?
I am truely astounded at the stupidity of out society.

Profile

raeschae: (Default)
raeschae

January 2013

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 11:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios